翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Strachan ・ R v Suberu ・ R v Sullivan ・ R v Sullivan (Canada) ・ R v Sussex Justices, ex p McCarthy ・ R v Swain ・ R v Symonds ・ R v Tang ・ R v Terry ・ R v Tessling ・ R v Therens ・ R v Thomas ・ R v Thomas Equipment Ltd ・ R v Tse ・ R v Turcotte ・ R v Turpin ・ R v Tutton ・ R v U (FJ) ・ R v Vaillancourt ・ R v Van der Peet ・ R v Verity-Amm ・ R v Victor ・ R v Viljoen ・ R v W (D) ・ R v Walker ・ R v Wallace ・ R v Wang ・ R v Wanhalla ・ R v Waterfield ・ R v Wells Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Turpin ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Turpin ''R v Turpin'', () 1 S.C.R. 1296 is a constitutional case of the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to trial by jury. The Court held that the requirement for a murder trial to be conducted in front of a judge and jury did not violate the right to trial by jury under s 11(f) of the ''Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms'', nor the equality guarantee under s 15 of the Charter. ==Background== Sharon Turpin and Latif Siddiqui were tried for first degree murder in Ontario. The ''Criminal Code'' at that time required that all murder cases were to be tried in front of a judge and jury.〔''Criminal Code'', RSC 1970, c C-34, ss 427, 429 and 430.〕 Turpin and Siddiqui challenged the constitutionality of the provisions on two grounds. First, they claimed that section 11(f) of the ''Charter'' granted them a right to choose between judge alone or judge and jury, which was violated by the Code provisions. Second, they argued that since there is an exception to the Code provisions for trials in Alberta, there was a violation of their right to equality under section 15 of the ''Charter''. At trial, the judge found that the provisions were unconstitutional for violating both sections. On appeal, the ruling was overturned. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Turpin」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.